Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a heterogenous condition that has no biologically relevant subtypes yet. Here, we utilized a multidimensional approach considering social deficits in ASD alongside negative valence and empathy dysfunction to distinguish ASD from Neurotypicals (NT) and to generate ASD subtypes using machine learning approaches. 114 subjects were analyzed, with 70 being NT and 44 ASD, all male with an IQ greater than 70, with 5 domains of personality (NEO-PI-r) and Reading the Mind the Eyes Test (RMET) scores included in the main classifier. We then used a multitude of behavioral (such as IQ, Broader Autism Phenotype, Autism Quotient, Interpersonal Reactivity Index) and clinical measures such as Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R) alongside biological methods including DNA methylation of OXTR gene and resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) to validate the putative subtypes. 30 ASD who received IN-OXT in a randomized, placebo-controlled, within-subject design and 17 new NT were part of the rs-FC analysis. A random forest tree algorithm was used to classify NT and ASD and Shapley Additive Explanation Values were used to describe the model and to cluster ASD subtypes using K-Means clustering. Three subtypes were generated with two of them being highly distinctive in behavioral and brain functional traits. One subtype named NASA (or Negative Affect and Social Aloofness) was characterized by high Neuroticism and Low warmth alongside lower rsFC between networks involved in social cognition, self-awareness, and sensory processing, such as Superior Temporal Sulcus and Sensorimotor Network; or ACC/Insula with visual cortex, Posterior Cingulate Cortex and visual cortex. The second subtype NADR (Neurocognitive and Affect Dysregulation with Resistance to Change) was characterized by higher DNA methylation of OXTR, hyperconnectivity between default mode network, reward areas and inferior frontal and fusiform networks. NADR has more cognitive difficulties and higher ADI-R scores as well as higher Neuroticism, higher personal distress, higher rigidity and lower openness. In a mixed model analysis, we found that IN-OXT in a dose dependent manner impacted NASA subtype by modulating rsFC between PCC and cerebellum and between Brainstem/Cerebellum and Parietal cortex to probably enhance social cognition and to reduce negative valence in this subtype.

BackgroundThe influence of genetic and environmental factors, especially during early development, is critical in the pathogenesis of autism. Maternal autoantibodies that recognize specific fetal brain proteins can be strong predictors of autism risk. These antibodies cross the placenta and bind to their target antigens, which play critical roles in neurodevelopment, thereby increasing autism risk. This etiologically defined subtype is now referred to as Maternal Autoantibody-Related Autism (MARA). The newly developed MAR-AutismTM test is an indirect multi-ELISA assay designed to detect specific combinations of these maternal antibodies, which strongly predicts increased autism risk. ObjectiveTranslation of the indirect ELISA assays for the eight relevant antibodies (LDH-A, LDH-B, GDA, STIP1, CRMP1, CRMP2, NSE and YBOX) from an academic laboratory to a clinical development laboratory for optimization and determination of the analytical performance of the individual antibody assays. MethodsFeasibility assays were transferred from the academic laboratory and their performance confirmed prior to optimization of all steps from target protein production to preliminary threshold determination. Validation to rigorous standards was conducted. The ELISAs are qualitative assays using an internal continuous response and a cutoff to define positivity and negativity for each analyte. Analytical performance metrics of linearity, sensitivity, specificity, precision, and stability were determined by standard testing methodologies. ResultsThe optimized ELISAs all performed at acceptable standards for analytical performance. All of the assays except one were demonstrated to be linear upon dilution with buffer and with non-reactive plasma, however, recovery was overestimated with buffer diluent. The precision profile results demonstrated that the Lower Limit of Quantification (LOQ) was greater than the Limit of Detection (LOD) and below the preliminary thresholds determined from a general population cohort distribution. Precision studies showed coefficients of variation less than 15% with two minor exceptions. Common interfering substances, apart from whole human IgG, did not affect assay performance. The microtiter assay plates were stable for at least 6 months without significant drift. ConclusionOverall, the individual antibody assays demonstrated high sensitivity, specificity, and robustness sufficient to enable extension to clinical validation. These assays enable evaluation of specific antibody combinations that were previously reported to strongly and specifically correlate with autism risk, particularly in settings of suspected diagnosis or in families with an older sibling with a confirmed autism diagnosis.

ObjectiveTo analyze the structure of mental disorders in children in the outpatient practice of a specialized mental health center for optimization of care organization for this patient category. MethodsA retrospective analysis of medical records of 23 children (out of 44 patients) at the Insight Mental Health Center (Dushanbe, Tajikistan) was conducted for the period from December 9, 2025, to January 8, 2026. Diagnosis was performed according to ICD-10 criteria using standardized instruments: M-CHAT-R, ADOS-2, and ADI-R for autism spectrum disorder (ASD); SNAP-IV for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD); CGI; and pediatric versions of PHQ and GAD. ResultsChildren accounted for 52% of all patients. Primary school-age children (7-12 years) predominated at 43.5%. Disorders of psychological development (F80-F89) dominated the nosological structure at 82.6%, with ASD comprising 56.5%. ADHD was diagnosed in 30.4% of cases. Comorbidity was registered in 47.7% of patients. ConclusionThe structure of pediatric psychiatric pathology is characterized by a predominance of developmental disorders and high comorbidity levels, justifying the need for a multidisciplinary approach.

BackgroundCaregiver skills training programmes are well-researched in the fields of autism and intellectual disability, but children with motor disorders such as cerebral palsy remain underrepresented despite their high prevalence. These caregivers face unique challenges, and group programmes may provide family-centred care through information provision, problem-solving and peer support. MethodsSystematic searches of five databases (CINAHL, Medline, Embase, PsychINFO and ERIC) were conducted for interventional studies of group programmes aiming to improve the skills, confidence and wellbeing of caregivers of children with neurodisability focusing on motor disorders. Data were extracted on study and intervention characteristics and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed, effect sizes calculated, and results summarised descriptively using forest plots. ResultsOf 6093 studies identified, 21 studies met inclusion criteria (nine randomised-controlled trials, two quasi-experimental and ten pre-post designs). Most reported on programmes developed in resource-constrained settings and addressed caregiver skills, coping strategies, or health-promoting behaviours. Outcomes were grouped according to caregiver wellbeing, caregiver skills and confidence, and social support and family functioning. Child outcomes were reported separately. Most caregiver outcomes showed positive effects, though most studies had high risk of bias due to self-reported outcomes and lack of blinding of intervention allocation and outcome measurement. DiscussionGroup-based training programmes show promise for improving caregiver skills and wellbeing. Clinicians and stakeholders in high-income countries may learn from these innovations in low-resource settings. Future research should strengthen protocol reporting, address attrition, control for confounding factors, and establish a core set of caregiver-reported outcomes to better capture programme impact. Systematic review registrationPROSPERO registration CRD42024595002

Rare pathogenic variants in many genes contribute to neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), including intellectual disability and/or global developmental delay (ID), autism spectrum disorder (ASD), epilepsy (EP), and cerebral palsy (CP). These conditions frequently co-occur and share genetic etiologies, yet the broader phenotypic eYects and the extent of shared versus distinct genetic influences remain unclear. Here, we adopt a cross-disorder framework to examine NDD genes across four diagnostic categories, characterize gene-associated phenotypic profiles, and identify convergent pathways that help refine how pathogenic variants in these genes shapes clinical outcomes. Using a discovery cohort of 8,973 probands with disease-causing variants in 263 NDD genes, we performed phenotype-based gene clustering and identified six distinct gene clusters. These clusters reveal structured patterns of genetic overlap, showing that subsets of NDD genes preferentially contribute to specific disorder combinations of ID, ASD, EP, and CP. The largest gene cluster was characterized by ID, whereas the other five included one enriched for ASD and ID, two for EP and ID and two for CP and ID, each with significantly diYering frequencies. In an independent validation cohort of 19,704 probands, five of the six clusters were replicated. Gene Ontology enrichment analyses revealed distinct biological processes in each cluster, suggesting that coherent molecular mechanisms underlie the diYering NDD diagnostic profiles. Together these findings demonstrate that NDD genes fall into coherent clusters that consistently map onto characteristic phenotype profiles, providing a framework to inform future therapeutic strategies and support early prognostication for individuals with pathogenic variants in NDD genes.

ImportanceWhole genome sequencing (WGS) is increasingly used to diagnose severely ill children, yet the long-term impact of a genetic diagnosis on healthcare utilization and resource allocation remains poorly understood. ObjectiveTo determine the influence of a genetic diagnosis via WGS on long-term healthcare utilization metrics in severely ill children. DesignA retrospective cohort study using data from the Next Generation Children study (2016-2020) with record linkage and analysis of primary care records conducted between 2022 and 2024. SettingA multicenter study involving primary care and hospital records linked via the UK National Health Research Institute (NIHR) Rare Disease Bioresource, Cambridge, UK. ParticipantsA referred sample of 270 severely ill children who underwent WGS. Exposure(s)Receipt of a genetic diagnosis (87/270; 32%) compared to those who remained undiagnosed (183/270; 68%) following WGS. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Comparison of 36 healthcare utilization parameters, including hospitalizations, primary care prescriptions, and diagnostic tests. ResultsAmong the 270 children analyzed, those receiving a genetic diagnosis (n=87) exhibited significantly higher overall healthcare utilization compared to undiagnosed peers (n=183). This included increased hospital admissions and outpatient visits, particularly for neurodevelopmental and seizure-related conditions. Diagnosed children received a higher volume of neurological, gastrointestinal, and nutritional prescriptions. The most pronounced differences in utilization were observed in children initially diagnosed in neonatal (NICU) or pediatric (PICU) intensive care settings. While genetic diagnosis was not associated with reduced healthcare costs during the study period, it was linked to more targeted, condition-specific medical care. Conclusions and RelevanceWGS diagnosis facilitates the integration of specialist care and the alignment of healthcare resources with the specific needs of children with complex disorders. These findings suggest that while costs may not decrease immediately, a diagnosis enables more precise and targeted clinical management. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSDoes a genetic diagnosis through whole genome sequencing influence long-term healthcare utilization in severely ill children? FindingsIn this cohort study of 270 children, those who received a genetic diagnosis demonstrated significantly greater overall healthcare utilization, including more hospitalizations and targeted prescriptions, compared with undiagnosed children. MeaningA genetic diagnosis facilitates the integration of specialized, condition-specific care, helping to align healthcare resources with the individual needs of children with complex disorders.

BackgroundParental genetics matters for childrens behavioural difficulties, but the extent to which this is due to direct genetic transmission versus environmentally mediated indirect genetic effects remains unclear. MethodsWe studied eight European birth cohorts with over 33,000 family-based trio samples. We analysed polygenic scores (PGSs) for 13 mental health and neurodevelopmental conditions and their composite indices (PC1 and mean) representing general neuropsychiatric liabilities, as well as educational attainment (EA) and alcohol and cigarette use, from children (PGSc), mothers (PGSm), and fathers. Child internalising, externalising, and total difficulties reported by mothers and/or fathers were examined at preschool and school ages. We then conducted multivariate meta-analyses to combine cohort-level results. FindingsWe observed several direct genetic effects on externalising difficulties, while indirect genetic influences were mainly identified for internalising difficulties. Specifically, child PGSs for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and EA predicted higher and lower levels, respectively, of child externalising and total difficulties (all pFDR<0{middle dot}001; for school-aged externalising difficulties, PGSc-ADHD: {beta}=0{middle dot}121 [95% CI 0{middle dot}091 to 0{middle dot}151], pFDR<0{middle dot}0001; PGSc-EA: {beta}=-0{middle dot}095 [95% CI -0{middle dot}127 to -0{middle dot}063], pFDR<0{middle dot}0001), whereas maternal PGSs for major depressive disorder (MDD) and general neuropsychiatric liabilities were associated with internalising and total difficulties across parental raters and child ages (all pFDR<0{middle dot}05; for school-aged internalising difficulties, PGSm-MDD: {beta}=0{middle dot}049 [95% CI 0{middle dot}017 to 0{middle dot}081], pFDR=0{middle dot}016; PGSm-PC1: {beta}=0{middle dot}056 [95% CI 0{middle dot}022 to 0{middle dot}091], pFDR=0{middle dot}011). No statistically significant effects from paternal PGSs were identified. InterpretationIn this multi-cohort study, findings across multiple traits, raters, and ages supported several direct genetic effects of ADHD and EA on child externalising difficulties and indirect genetic effects on internalising difficulties, especially maternal depression and general neuropsychiatric liabilities. These suggest that child internalising difficulties are not solely driven by direct genetic transmission. More comprehensive research is needed to better understand the mechanisms involved, and ultimately how to ameliorate child behavioural difficulties. FundingEU, ERC, RCN, RCF, UKRI, SERI, DFG Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSIndirect genetic effects (IGEs) refer to the influence of parental genotypes on offspring outcomes beyond direct genetic effects (DGEs), for example via environmental pathways. While IGEs on offspring cognitive traits are well-established for educational attainment, evidence for IGEs of parental liabilities to mental health and neurodevelopmental conditions remains limited. To assess the current state of evidence, we conducted a systematic search of published studies applying trio-based polygenic score (PGS) designs to child and adolescent mental health outcomes. We identified 141 primary studies in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, and Web of Science, by 6 March 2025, after removing duplicates; following screening, 12 studies met inclusion criteria (see supplement for a full description including results). Ten out of the 12 studies focused on externalising outcomes, with little or inconsistent support for IGEs. When observed, IGEs were mainly driven by maternal liabilities to autism, educational attainment, and cognitive performance on child outcomes. The current evidence was too limited and heterogeneous to synthesize findings quantitatively, therefore a qualitative synthesis was conducted. Many studies were statistically underpowered, and the observed IGEs were in all cases sample-specific. There were no published multi-cohort studies. Added value of this studyWe integrated information across over 33,000 mother-father-child trios from eight European cohorts, investigating 18 PGSs from parents and children, using maternal and paternal ratings of offsprings internalising, externalising, and total difficulties as outcomes at both preschool and school age. We mainly observed DGEs on externalising difficulties, consistent with previous studies. Some evidence of IGEs was found for internalising and total difficulties. IGEs were often found to be maternally driven, with the most robust evidence across ages and raters emerging for maternal depression and general neuropsychiatric liabilities. Implications of all the available evidenceThe current evidence suggests that childrens behavioural difficulties, especially internalising difficulties, may be partly driven by the environment shaped by maternal neuropsychiatric liabilities. Ours and previous findings highlight a pressing need for more comprehensive studies across different cohorts, raters, outcomes, and time points to understand the true extent of IGEs in the intergenerational transmission of mental health.

BackgroundOrganization, time management, and planning (OTMP) difficulties are associated with academic underachievement. OTMP skills training programs are effective in reducing OTMP deficits and improving academic performance. A randomized controlled trial of Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills (HOPS) for students ages 11-14 (1) found it to be effective with medium to large effects. In that study, HOPS was provided by counselors employed by the research team. This study is a replication examining HOPS under more authentic conditions when providers are employed by schools serving enrolled students. The primary aim is to evaluate HOPS offered by school providers in relation to treatment-as-usual/waitlist (TAU/WL). To respond to limited school resources post-COVID-19, HOPS is also provided by research team members, creating the opportunity to replicate the findings from the prior trial (1) and explore differential effectiveness when HOPS is implemented by school vs. research providers. MethodsStudents in about 30 schools serving students ages 11-14 will be enrolled. Schools are randomly assigned to HOPS vs. TAU/WL on a 2:1 ratio. Students assigned to HOPS schools are randomly assigned to a school vs. research provider on a 1:1 basis. Providers receive two hours of training and additional assistance on request. Child outcomes related to OTMP skills, homework, and academic performance are assessed at post-treatment, 6-month (from baseline) follow-up, and 12-month follow-up. HOPS sessions are video recorded for fidelity coding. Potential effect modifiers include student ADHD, oppositional defiant, and internalizing symptoms, and family socioeconomic level. Analyses will use mixed effects modeling. The goal of the study is to enroll 135 participants, yielding a minimal detectable effect size of 0.50, within the expected range based on prior research. DiscussionThe study is unique in examining intervention implementation and effectiveness when intervention is provided under authentic practice conditions. Trial RegistrationThis study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04465708).

BackgroundPediatric long COVID is associated with substantial symptom burden, yet evidence-based pharmacologic treatments remain limited. Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) has been proposed as a potential symptomatic therapy, but data in pediatric populations is lacking. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of pediatric and young adult patients ([&le;]25 years) with a clinical diagnosis of long COVID who were prescribed LDN between July 2020 and July 2025 at three multidisciplinary pediatric long COVID programs in the United States. Deidentified clinical data were extracted from medical records. Outcomes included symptom prevalence, dosing practices, treatment continuation or discontinuation, adverse effects, and available patient-reported quality-of-life measures (PedsQL and PROMIS(R)). FindingsThe study included 62 patients (mean age, 15.6 years [range, 8-23]; 53.2% male and 46.8% female). Fatigue was nearly universal (98.4%), followed by headaches (87.1%), brain fog (74.2%), dizziness/lightheadedness (67.7%), anxiety (66.1%), and post-exertional malaise (56.5%). LDN-treated patients demonstrated a higher prevalence of neurocognitive and autonomic symptoms, compared to general clinic cohorts. Most patients (71.0%) reported no adverse effects; the most common were vivid dreams (9.7%) and insomnia (9.7%). At follow-up, 66.1% of patients remained on LDN. Medication discontinuation was attributed to perceived lack of benefit (43.8%) or side effects (25.0%). Baseline quality-of-life measures at initiation showed marked impairment: PedsQL Physical Health (M=38.0, SD=20.9) and Multidimensional Fatigue (M=35.7, SD=15.8) scores were low. PROMIS scores indicated reduced physical functioning (M=36.8, SD=8.7) and cognitive functioning (M=40.8, SD=7.6), with elevated fatigue (M=68.0, SD=10.4) and pain interference (M=58.6, SD=8.2) relative to population norms. The study was not designed to assess efficacy. InterpretationLDN was primarily prescribed to patients with prominent fatigue, neurocognitive symptoms, and autonomic dysfunction, and was generally well tolerated. These findings provide descriptive evidence of real-world prescribing practices and support the need for clinical trials to systematically evaluate LDNs efficacy in pediatric long COVID.

Students who frequently miss school are at greater risk for academic difficulty. High levels of absenteeism as early as kindergarten have been associated with long-term consequences, such as low reading proficiency in Grade 3 and low academic achievement in Grade 5, both of which have been associated with lower rates of high school graduation and enrollment in post-secondary education. The prevalence of school absenteeism has increased significantly since the COVID-19 pandemic and there have been sustained shifts in student attendance rates from kindergarten to Grade 12 since 2020. The goals of this population-level, repeated cross-sectional cohort study were to compare rates of chronic absenteeism, defined as being absent from school at least 10% of the time, in kindergarten in Canada before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, and examine the association between childrens chronic absenteeism and their concurrent developmental vulnerability. A total of 513,159 kindergarten children participated in the study, with 284,712 (55.5%) being in the pre-COVID-19 cohort (2017-2020) and 228,447 (44.5%) in the post-COVID-19 cohort (2020-2023). Across Canada, rates of chronic absenteeism increased from pre- to post-COVID-19, from 17.7% to 41.3%, with differences by jurisdiction. The greatest increase was seen in Ontario, while the smallest increase was seen in British Columbia. Children attending kindergarten in the post-COVID-19 cohort were three times more likely to be chronically absent compared to their peers attending kindergarten before the onset of the pandemic. Despite this, chronic absenteeism in the post-COVID-19 period was associated with reduced odds of overall developmental vulnerability, a pattern that is likely attributable to shifts in the composition of chronically absent children. In the post-COVID-19 cohort, a greater percentage of children who were chronically absent resided in higher SES neighbourhoods compared to their chronically absent peers attending school before the onset of the pandemic. While increasing rates of school absenteeism should not be ignored, our results suggest that chronic absenteeism following COVID-19 might be more nuanced than before. The jurisdictional differences in rates of chronic absenteeism observed in this study could be due to the various public health measures put in place by the various provincial and territorial governments. It is also possible that the children from higher SES neighbourhoods missed more school after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic because their parents had the capability to work from home, making it easier to keep their child(ren) home from school. The decreased association between chronic absenteeism and developmental vulnerability post-COVID-19 may reflect improved access to online resources, which enables students to stay on track academically from home. Gaining a better understanding of the reasons behind missing school and the relation between absenteeism and academic achievement at various developmental stages is crucial to support successful learning trajectories.

Numerous studies have shown that adults with depression have distinct oculomotor alterations during saccade tasks, but whether similar alterations occur in adolescents is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to test if eye-tracking during a structured saccade task could distinguish a group of adolescents with depression from healthy controls. We hypothesized that, due to overlapping circuitry between depression pathology and the oculomotor system, adolescents with depression would show alterations in fixation, saccade, and pupil behaviour. 51 adolescents with depression and 66 age-matched healthy controls completed the Interleaved Pro- and Anti-Saccade Task (IPAST) and several self-reported questionnaires for psychiatric symptoms. Oculomotor outcomes included fixation acquisition, fixation breaks, correct rate, saccadic reaction time, rate of correct express-latency pro-saccades, rate of express- and regular-latency anti-saccade errors, baseline pupil size, as well as pupil constriction and dilation sizes following task instruction. In comparison to healthy controls, adolescents with depression displayed impairments acquiring fixation (p<.001), made more fixation breaks in pro- (p=.023) and anti-saccade trials (p=.005), more anti-saccade errors (p=.013), more express-latency saccades overall (ps=.016), had a smaller pupil constriction in pro-saccade trials (p=.047) and had a smaller pupil dilation in pro- (p=.011) and anti-saccade trials (p=.041). No differences were found for saccadic reaction time, rate of correct pro-saccades, rate of regular-latency anti-saccade errors, pupil constriction size during anti-saccade trials, or baseline pupil size. Patients had psychiatric comorbidities and were using psychotropic medication. While this reflected clinical reality, these factors may have influenced oculomotor behaviour. Adolescents with depression had altered fixation, saccade, and pupil behaviour during IPAST. Given that many cases of adolescent depression remain undetected, accessible and objective screening approaches are highly needed. This oculomotor phenotype may be used in the development of such a screening tool to detect those at risk.

PurposeCaregivers of children with complex neurodisability frequently experience high caregiving demands, social isolation, unmet support needs, and reduced wellbeing. This paper explores caregivers perceptions of the impact of "Encompass", a ten-modular, community-based group support programme for caregivers of children under five with complex neurodisability, co-facilitated by an expert parent. Materials and methodsThis study formed part of a pilot and feasibility study conducted in two socially disadvantaged, ethnically diverse urban areas in the United Kingdom. Outcome measures were collected pre-intervention, post-intervention and at three-month follow-up to explore caregiver wellbeing, empowerment, activation, and quality of life. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted within three months of programme completion. Interview data were analysed using deductive coding informed by the "Encompass" programme theory alongside inductive analysis to explore mechanisms and unanticipated benefits. Results and conclusionsSeven participating caregivers described improved wellbeing, increased confidence in caring for their child, navigating services, advocating for their family and engaging in the community. Peer support, shared learning and expert parent facilitation were key identified mechanisms of impact. Data from outcome measures showed patterns of improvement post-intervention, with less consistent eYects at follow-up. Findings confirmed the key change mechanisms, informing future iterations and other caregiver group programmes. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06310681

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD; MIM 209850) is reported to vary globally from 0.01% in East Asian populations to 4.36% in certain Australian cohorts. Despite high heritability estimates (61-94%), the genetic architecture underlying ASD susceptibility remains poorly characterized across diverse populations, as most genomic studies have initially focused on individuals of European ancestry. To investigate ancestry-specific genetic contributions to ASD, we analyzed whole-genome sequencing data from three independent ASD cohorts. We identified admixed ASD probands (n = 1 033) and ancestry-matched controls (n = 1 033) and performed admixture mapping (AM). AM using five continental reference populations (European, African, East Asian, South Asian, and Native American) identified five ancestry-specific ASD-susceptibility loci, including one African-related locus at 1p21.2 near S1PR1 and four Native American-associated loci at chromosome 11q13.4. Three of these latter loci were contiguous and encompassed genes previously implicated in ASD, notably SHANK2 and DHCR7, with fine-mapping identifying a significantly associated variant between the two genes (rs77695321; P = 1.52 x 10-). The fourth Native American-associated signal at 11q13.4 overlapped the folate receptor genes FOLR1 and FOLR3, with fine-mapping identifying a genome-wide significant variant (rs7950807; P = 5.21 x 10-). A secondary admixture mapping analysis restricted to Latin American individuals, incorporating 6 487 Brazilian controls, identified 16 additional ancestry-specific loci across seven genomic regions.

ImportancePrenatal cannabis exposure is increasing in prevalence, yet its associations with early brain development--particularly how the timing and frequency of exposure across gestation relate to neonatal brain structure--remain insufficiently understood. Clarifying these associations is essential for informing early risk identification and guiding perinatal care. ObjectiveTo examine associations between patterns of maternal prenatal cannabis exposure, including exposure presence, gestational timing, and frequency of exposure, and neonatal brain structure and microstructure during the first month of life. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study included 1,782 mother-infant dyads (221 with PCE) from the HEALthy Brain and Child Development Study. Mother-reported prenatal cannabis exposure was assessed using the validated Timeline Follow-back method. Infants underwent natural-sleep magnetic resonance imaging, including T2-weighted structural imaging and diffusion imaging, within the first month of life. Main Outcomes and MeasuresAssociations between prenatal cannabis exposure and regional T2-weighted volumes and diffusion white matter microstructure metrics examined (1) exposure presence, (2) gestational timing of exposure, and (3) frequency of exposure within exposed infants. ResultsAny prenatal cannabis exposure was associated with brain volume differences in cerebellar and subcortical limbic regions, including smaller amygdala, thalamic, and cerebellar vermis volumes and larger caudate, hippocampal, and cerebellar cortex volumes. Timing-specific analyses revealed divergent patterns: first trimester exposure was associated with smaller volumes in select regions, whereas exposure that continued into the third trimester was associated with larger volumes in overlapping structures, with additional subcortical volumetric differences observed. White matter microstructure alterations were observed only among infants with exposure that continued into the third trimester. Within the exposed subgroup, higher frequency of cannabis exposure was associated with larger cerebral white matter volumes and white matter microstructural differences in white matter regions. Conclusions and RelevanceIn infants with maternal prenatal cannabis exposure, we observed timing- and frequency-dependent differences in brain development within the first month of life. These findings underscore the importance of considering not only the presence of exposure, but also when and how much cannabis is used during pregnancy to support targeted prenatal counseling and early developmental monitoring for exposed infants. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSIs prenatal cannabis exposure associated with brain development in the first month of life? FindingsIn a cohort[ABS] of 1,782 mother-infant dyads, prenatal cannabis exposure was associated with region-specific differences in neonatal brain volumes. Brain volume and diffusion white matter microstructure associations differed between exposure limited to the first trimester versus exposure that continued into the third trimester. Greater frequency of exposure across gestation was also associated with volumetric and microstructural differences. MeaningThe timing and frequency of prenatal cannabis exposure is associated with alterations in neonatal brain development, underscoring the importance of addressing cannabis use in pregnancy.

BackgroundWhile growing evidence implicates sleep-wake and circadian rhythm disturbances (SCRDs) in the onset and course of mood and psychotic disorders, longitudinal studies using objective measures are limited. This clinical cohort study examined whether actigraphy-derived SCRDs (sleep duration, timing, and efficiency) predicted transition to (i) any full-threshold mental disorders; and then specifically: (ii) full-threshold bipolar or psychotic disorders or (iii) other full-threshold (i.e. depressive or anxiety) disorders, in youth accessing mental health care. MethodsActigraphy monitoring was completed for 5-23 days in 250 participants (aged 12-30) presenting to youth-focused early intervention services in Sydney, Australia. Participants were followed longitudinally as part of the Optymise cohort for 6+ months (up to 8 years; median 2.5 years). Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models estimated associations between SCRDs and illness progression, after controlling for relevant baseline clinical and demographic covariates (e.g., age, sex, social and occupational functioning, mania-like and psychotic-like experiences, medication use). ResultsLonger sleep duration at baseline predicted higher odds of transition (OR = 2.23 [95%CI = 1.38-3.74]), and shorter time-to-transition (HR = 2.05 [95%CI = 1.23-3.40]) to full-threshold bipolar or psychotic disorders. This effect remained significant after controlling for clinical covariates. Later sleep midpoint predicted transition to any full-threshold mental disorder (OR = 1.46 [95%CI = 1.02-2.17]) at the uncorrected significance level. ConclusionsExcessive sleep duration may represent an early marker of vulnerability for progression to severe mental illness. Findings support the prognostic utility of objective measures of SCRDs to guide indicated prevention and early intervention.

Introduction"Encompass" is a participatory group-based intervention originating from low- and middle-income countries, co-developed with parents and professionals to enhance the wellbeing, health literacy and empowerment of caregivers of young children with complex neurodisability. We aimed to assess feasibility and acceptability of a) intervention delivery in two socially deprived United Kingdom (UK) urban areas and b) evaluation methods including data collection on programme outcomes and costs. MethodsWe conducted a mixed-methods pilot and feasibility study with caregivers of children under five years with complex neurodisability. Feasibility and acceptability of intervention delivery were assessed based on recruitment rates, group attendance, fidelity checklists and qualitative interviews with caregivers and facilitators. Feasibility and acceptability of evaluation methods were explored through follow-up rates, questionnaire completeness, and caregiver feedback on outcome measures. Data relating to implementation at organisational and system levels were explored through interviews with facilitators and key partners. Results were compared to predefined traffic light criteria (green, amber, red) to determine whether a larger scale evaluation was warranted. ResultsEight caregivers participated in the programme. Fidelity of delivery and follow-up questionnaire completion met green criteria, while recruitment and attendance met amber criteria, indicating that minor adaptations are required before scaling up. Qualitative findings demonstrated high acceptability of the programme among caregivers and facilitators, particularly valuing the co-facilitation model, participatory approach, and peer support. Flexible delivery, including online participation and communication support, enhanced accessibility for families with diverse needs. Capturing programme delivery costs was feasible and provided preliminary estimates to inform future economic evaluation. ConclusionsOur findings provide proof of principle that "Encompass" can feasibly and acceptably be delivered and evaluated with caregivers of children with complex neurodisability in an ethnically diverse UK community health setting. The findings support progression to a larger-scale evaluation, with refinements to recruitment strategies and delivery logistics. Patient or Public ContributionCaregivers with lived experience were central to developing the "Encompass" programme and this study. Four local mothers of children with complex neurodisability contributed to planning, recruitment, and sense-checking the findings.

IntroductionSepsis is a life-threatening ailment caused by an exaggerated immune response to infection that poses a major health problem, with increasing prevalence, high costs, and poor outcomes. Improved outcomes are seen in patients when providers follow the Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommended clinical practice guidelines for identifying and treating sepsis using a 3-hour and 6-hour bundle after sepsis is suspected. Previous research has shown patients with mental health issues receive worse quality of diabetes and cardiac care and have poorer outcomes compared with those without mental health issues. Similarly, patients with mental health issues may receive worse sepsis care due to inability to explain symptoms, agitation, etc. This study explores sepsis quality of care among patients with vs. without an acute mental health crisis, and whether patients with certain mental health issues were more likely to receive sepsis bundle care than others. MethodsUsing data extracted from 2018-2019 at the Long Island Jewish Medical Center Emergency Department (ED), patients who met sepsis inclusion criteria were grouped into either having, or not having, a severe mental illness crisis on the basis of whether physical or chemical restraints were used in the ED. Patients with a history of a severe mental illness, but who were not in a severe mental health crisis, were grouped with the patients without mental health illness, as, in the absence of an acute psychiatric problem, their mental health issue unlikely affected sepsis care. We describe demographic characteristics of both groups and performed a univariate analysis using Students T-test to compare the percent of those with vs. without acute mental health crisis who received full 3- and 6-hour sepsis bundle care. Patients with an acute mental health crisis were grouped according to "cognitive" (eg, dementia) vs. "non-cognitive" (eg, schizophrenia) disorders. ResultsComparing those with vs. without acute mental health crisis, there was no difference in the percent of patients who received 3-hour sepsis bundle care (80.7% vs 74.9%, p = 0.1456). However, among patients who received the 3-hour bundle, a significantly-greater percent of those with an acute mental health crisis received the 6-hour sepsis bundle (51.0% vs. 30.7%, p <0.0001). There was no difference between different groups of patients with mental health issues (eg, "cognitive" vs. "non-cognitive") with respect to receiving 3- or 6-hour sepsis bundle care. DiscussionSurprisingly, although there was no significant difference in likelihood to receive a 3-hour sepsis bundle among patients with vs. without an acute mental health crisis, those with an acute mental health crisis were more-likely to receive 6-hour care. We suspect this difference might be due to increased attention paid to patients with an acute mental health crisis, including more-frequent room visits by hospital staff or more concerns among family members. No particular set of mental health conditions was associated with receiving or not receiving appropriate care. Future research could address possible confounding factors, go into more detail about the specific component of the sepsis protocol that patients failed to receive, and specify what aspects of a mental health crisis affected treatment plans. Future studies are needed to assess possible associations between severe mental illness crisis, bundle care, and mortality in relation to ED, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), or hospital length-of-stay (LOS).

Very preterm infants (<30 weeks gestation) are at elevated risk for neurodevelopmental and social-behavioral challenges. DNA methylation (DNAm) may provide a biological link between preterm birth and later behavioral outcomes. We examined associations between DNAm profiles at neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) discharge and at age 5 with Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) scores which measure social communication, social interaction, and repetitive behaviors at age 5, including sex-specific effects, in the Neonatal Neurobehavior and Outcomes in Very Preterm Infants (NOVI) Study. Epigenome-wide buccal DNAm was profiled at NICU discharge (n=218) and at 5 years (n=188). We identified 38 neonatal and 6 age-5 CpG sites associated with SRS scores (all q<0.05) using epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) at each time point. Several CpGs mapped to genes involved in neurodevelopment including TCF4, KLC4, CAP2, PTDSS1, ADAM12, SENP1, CHN2, SH3D19, and ITGA1, with sex-specific effects observed for CpGs in CAMTA1 and GABBR1. Enriched pathways included neurodevelopment, cytoskeletal regulation, stress-response, and metabolic processes. DNAm patterns during early life, particularly the neonatal period, were associated with social-behavioral development in very preterm children. Findings in key genes such as TCF4 and CAMTA1 highlight potential epigenetic mechanisms linking early-life biology to later behavioral challenges.

Background and ObjectivesDecision-making about resuscitating a critically ill child is complex yet common. We aimed to study the survival thresholds at which physicians, compared to parents, decide to treat or withhold resuscitating a child. Moreover, we aimed to compare physicians survival estimates with those from a nationwide registry. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey-based study in the United States. Clinical vignettes based on hypothetical survival probabilities were used to study and compare the decision thresholds for parents and physicians. Vignettes developed using the Get-With-The-Guidelines-Resuscitation registry were used to explore physicians decision thresholds and compare their survival estimates with those from the data. Thresholds were determined using mixed-effect logistic regression models. ResultsWe had decisions for 501 and 257 vignettes from 167 parents and 43 physicians, respectively. The decision threshold for survival to discharge was 5.3% (95% CI: 3.7 to 7.0) for physicians and 1.2% (95% CI: -0.8 to 3.0) for parents. Whereas the decision threshold for survival to discharge with PCPC 1 or 2 was 3.5% (95% CI: 1.1 to 7.1) for physicians and 0.6% (95% CI: -1.2 to 1.8) for parents. About 58% of the physicians overestimated the likelihood of survival. ConclusionsThe study found that the decision threshold for the physicians was higher than that for the parents (5.3% vs. 1.2%). This illustrates that parents still want to attempt resuscitation at a survival probability where physicians would recommend withholding resuscitation. These findings have implications for clinical practice and counseling the parents of critically ill hospitalized children.

Background At present, there are no approved pharmacological treatments for people at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P). We sought to assess the acceptability of cannabidiol (CBD): a promising candidate treatment for this population. Methods CHR-P individuals completed a survey which assessed their views on the acceptability of CBD, its expected effectiveness and side effects, and on formulation preferences. Results The sample comprised 55 CHR-P individuals (24.3 years and 69% female). Most (91%) were familiar with CBD, and had previously used cannabis (64%), and around half (42%) had tried over-the-counter CBD. 75% were willing to take CBD as an intervention for mental health problems. Most participants anticipated fewer side effects with CBD than with existing medications, and preferred tablet or capsule formulations over liquids. Discussion CBD is perceived as a highly acceptable treatment among CHR-P individuals.